Agenda: Promoting Unity in Truth Study
February 24 & 25, 2004
Place:
N.W.
21st Street Church of Christ, Oklahoma City, OK
Starts: 1:00 PM on the 24th
Ends: Noon on the 25th
February 24:
1:00 PM
Question: Defining Matters of Judgment vs. Matters of Doctrine. One of the
principles that guided our restoration fathers was “in matters of doctrine
unity; in matters of opinion liberty.” How does Paul’s teaching in Romans
14 and 15 correlate with this principle? How do we define “judgment” and
“doctrine?” What criteria should we use in making a distinction between the two?
To what extent should we hold brethren accountable in matters of opinion or
liberty? How do matters of opinion ultimately affect matters of doctrine or law?
Panelists who will introduce this topic with 7-minute talks each are: Doug
Edwards, Smith Bibens, Don Pruitt, and Dan Wissinger.
2:00 PM
Question: Reconciling the Scriptures that say “judge not” with those that
indicate we are to judge. Are we correct when we line up one list of scriptures
against another in an attempt to “cancel out” the side with which we do not
agree? Are there different types of judgment? What are the circumstances and
conditions in which we should and should not judge others? Is there a
difference in “judging” and “fruit inspection?” i.e., “by their fruits ye shall
know them.” Panelists: James Orten, Jim Crouch, Terry Baze, and Joe
Hisle.
3:00 PM
Question: Large Brotherhood Meetings. What are the pros and cons of such
meetings? Can we justify the cost of such meetings? Do they help or hinder in
the achievement of unity? What about a meeting so large that no one congregation
is able to support it? May several churches pool their funds in order to support
such a meeting? Would a number of smaller, regional meetings better serve
the cause of unity? What problems often surface in such meetings? Panelists:
Ronny Wade, Cliff Arney, Dennis Smith, and Joe Norton.
4:00 PM
Question: The Role of Human Organizations. What role do human organizations play
with reference to the work of the church? May a human organization do the work
of the church? Does the creation of such organizations diminish the role the
church should take in such areas? What about the sale of articles promoting the
organization and its work? How does this impact our relationship to the church
and its role? Panelists: Bruce Roebuck, Brett Hickey, Ronny Wade, and Michael
Fox.
Break For Dinner
Reassemble at 7:30 PM
Question: Congregational Autonomy in Practice. How does a congregation or an
individual know when he is violating congregational autonomy? Surely every
brother has a right to talk with brothers of another congregation. What actions
show that the line has been crossed? Do congregations have a right to decide who
they will use in their services, without censure or interference from other
congregations? Can one congregation scripturally withdraw fellowship from
another congregation?
Does autonomy grant immunity from censure by anyone? Panelists: Glen Osburn,
Richard Bunner, Carl Johnson, and Don Kelly.
February 25th
9:00 AM
Question: Determining the difference between public and private teaching
situations. Does the bible teach the concept of public and private teaching?
Does Acts 20:20 teach this concept? In what way does individual, incidental
teaching differ from organized studies? What limitations are placed on teaching
that is public in nature as opposed to teaching that is private? Panelists:
Johnny Elmore, Wayne Fussell, Jim Crouch, and Bennie Cryer.
10:00 AM
Question: The Role of Women in Teaching. May women arrange and organize
“brotherhood-wide” studies? In situations where women may teach, may she teach
anyone? In what situations are women prohibited from teaching? What is the scope
of her authority in arranging studies or teaching situations? Panelists: Alan
Bonifay, James Orten, Brandon Stephens, and Reggie Kinser.
11:00 AM
Question: What Constitutes a False Teacher? Does one automatically become a
false teacher merely because he is mistaken on a point of doctrine and discusses
it with others? Are a false teacher and a heretic the same? Can one be right on
a point of doctrine and still be a heretic (divisive person)? Does the attitude
with which one approaches a subject have anything to do with whether or not he
is a false teacher? Panelists: Raymond Fox, Allen Bailey, Steve Smith, and Jerry
Cutter.
Study ends following the question and answer session.