"CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS"  
  
                  Our Dependence Upon The New Testament  
  
INTRODUCTION  
  
1. We have seen the evidence from UNBIASED SOURCES that establishes  
   Jesus of Nazareth...  
   a. As a person of history  
   b. Who lived and died in the First Century A.D.  
  
2. But we also pointed out that such sources tell us nothing about...  
   a. Who He was  
   b. What He did  
   ...to earn such a reputation that, centuries later, His teachings and  
   life still has so much influence in our society  
  
3. For the Christian, the only record which describes in any detail the  
   life and death of Jesus is the NEW TESTAMENT  
   a. But as a HISTORICAL DOCUMENT, is it reliable?  
   b. Can we trust it to be accurate in relating facts of history con-  
      cerning Jesus, His life, death and resurrection?  
   c. Can we even have confidence that what we have today in the form  
      of the New Testament is an accurate copy of that penned by the  
      original authors?  
  
4. These are some of the questions we shall attempt to answer as we  
   begin to examine "THE HISTORICAL RELIABILITY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT"  
  
[But first, for CHRISTIANS to appreciate the importance of this  
subject, it may help to demonstrate how dependent our faith is on the  
reliability of the New Testament as a historical document...]  
  
I. WHY DO WE BELIEVE THAT JESUS IS THE CHRIST, THE SON OF GOD?  
  
   A. THE "ANSWERS" WE MOST LIKELY WOULD GIVE ARE...  
      1. "Because of the miracles He did"  
      2. "Because He fulfilled hundreds of the Messianic prophecies  
          found in the Old Testament"  
      3. "Because He rose from the dead"  
  
   B. BUT WHERE DOES ONE LEARN ABOUT THESE THINGS?  
      1. Where do we read about His miracles?  THE NEW TESTAMENT!  
      2. Who says that He fulfilled the Messianic prophecies?  THE  
         AUTHORS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT!  
      3. What evidence is there for the resurrection of Jesus Christ?  
         AGAIN, IT IS PRIMARILY IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!  
  
II. WHAT IF IT WERE SHOWN CONCERNING THE NEW TESTAMENT...  
  
   A. THAT IT WAS WRITTEN OVER 100 YEARS AFTER THE EVENTS SUPPOSEDLY  
      HAPPENED?  
      1. Then the New Testament was not written by eyewitnesses, nor by  
         those whose names are connected with it (Paul, Peter, etc.)!  
      2. It was the general consensus of many scholars in the last  
         century that the New Testament was in fact composed during the  
         Second Century A.D., not the First  
      3. If such is true, then the New Testament is a FORGERY!  
  
   B. THAT IT IS FILLED WITH ERRORS IN REFERENCE TO GEOGRAPHY, PEOPLE,  
      AND EVENTS?  
      1. Then how could we trust the authors of the New Testament to be  
         accurate in describing supernatural events, when they were  
         careless with describing the natural ones?  
      2. This would make the New Testament an UNRELIABLE RECORD!  
  
   C. THAT THE MANUSCRIPT EVIDENCE IS VERY SCARCE, AND A THOUSAND YEARS  
      REMOVED FROM THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS?  
      1. Then we would have no way of testing the accuracy of the  
         copyists, who for hundreds of years preserved the New Testament  
         only by making copies by hand  
      2. Then our faith in Jesus would be based upon shallow ground,  
         upon a document which is historically questionable!  
  
III. OUR FAITH IN JESUS IS DEPENDENT ON THE NEW TESTAMENT BEING  
     RELIABLE AS A HISTORICAL DOCUMENT!  
  
   A. "BLIND FAITH" MAY SEEM ADEQUATE FOR SOME...  
      1. For children who believe whatever their parents say  
      2. For people who are never placed in an environment where their  
         faith is challenged (like state universities)  
      3. For people who are not trying to convince others to trust in  
         Jesus for their salvation  
  
   B. BUT IF WE DESIRE TO HAVE A "STRONG FAITH" FOR OURSELVES AND  
      OTHERS...  
      1. Then we need to understand our dependency upon the New  
         Testament  
      2. We need to know how to demonstrate the evidence which supports  
         it as a reliable, historical document!  
  
CONCLUSION  
  
1. Hopefully, we now appreciate the need to carefully examine the  
   evidence for the historical reliability of the New Testament  
  
2. In doing so, we shall apply the same kind of tests applied to any  
   ancient document to determine its reliability!  
  
3. The next study will examine what is the "ACID TEST" for any ancient  
   document claiming to be a historical record of certain events...